Potential confounder: having a low-functioning autistic child is highly stressful and often unpleasant. Given the numerous different genetic correlates to autism, if one wants to preserve the diagnostic validity of autism by finding a single etiology, one might hypothesize that all of these genes affect a narrow set of brain circuitry in a similar way, but as discussed in the Waterhouse paper people have tried to do this and (per her lit review) failed to do so. However, once it exceeds a certain threshold, the network starts learning things that dont make any sense, and then when it tries to correct those mistakes it goes too far in the other direction again. Still, the IQ-boosting alleles produce autism instead of a more classical low IQ that genetic load alone would have had. 4. We cant do much about the genetic or random developmental stuff, but we can make sure most of the things that have stunted peoples intelligence over time go away. Ill share some info that might or might be helpful, since its just an anecdote. Slate Star Codex was a blog by Scott Alexander about human cognition Press J to jump to the feed. This would explain low-functioning autism from de novo mutations or obstetric trauma (the foundation is so weak that it fails no matter how short the tower is). I know plenty of highly intelligent people who nonetheless have very poor impulse control particularly when it comes to libidinous desires! Wheat has been genetically modified recently in ways that make it much worse for you. If so, then the top-level geniuses may well have something else going on upstairs to enhance their intelligence, some other difference from the norms, that isnt part of the complex of IQ/autism risk genes. Normal includes insecurities, anxieties, caring what other people think. On that and other evidence, its pretty clear the above article isnt talking about autistics like me. None are autistic, but both boys were a little socially awkwardbasically a couple years behind their classmates in this area. It really made a difference for him to get to a school where he fit with the other kids. I dont have time to go through all the links this morning but wanted to add some more studies. Any gene that increases A in a normal human makes that human more intelligent by pushing A closer to 10. Of course people like that exist. In most GWAS studies there has been little evidence of heterogeneity of association across phenotypic subgroups. These are the people that make the Turing test invalid, youd think they were the chatbot. Score: Energy/perseverance/drive and other harder to measure factors. Is it possible to measure autism on some scale, rather than as a binary category? Smart people who can manage things by themselves and mask the effects of their autism from others dont get diagnosed, because among other things they dont want to see a psychiatrist and can figure out how to stop people from forcing them to; they can also know the correct answer to psychiatric interviews and can figure out that the things currently bothering them are less likely to continue if they provide the correct answers. You might want to adjust for inflation. Third, and most important, there is a strong selection bias in the samples of autistic people. She is a university qualified computer systems engineer. If I personally were one of these hypothetical genius scientists in possession of technology that could reshape the world, I think that the most optimal strategy for me would be to offer this technology to the U.S. in exchange for a large sum of money say, $50 million. They all share the same hunger for mathematics, and if you get to know those who seem normal on the surface, you find out that they have some interesting hobbies as well. So I gave that fact to save others the effort to dig for it, while trying to give a subtle hint to you that it is better to include the finding. surveyed ~4000 MENSA members and found that in addition to being at a signficant increase in risk not just in ASDs and mood disorders but also in food allergies, asthma and 2x RR of autoimmune conditions compared to the general population. the classic stereotype.). We are both university qualified. Check out the similarities. I dont think 99% would stand out here, but I dont think itd quite be mediocre either. Right, genes are NOT good or bad. There are no other cases of autism diagnosed in the immediate family. The reason seems to be that there is great overlap in symptoms, although there is great diversity in symptoms. His auditory channel is very slow and only turns on when you say his name or repeat the question. That leads me to the following guess. Low-functioning autism has all kinds of genetic linkages to all kinds of different genetic syndromes that cause brain damage, damage that often extends beyond autistic symptoms. The top level of any domains is so hard that most people cant judge anything about it. the non-verbal. Because they survived due to wearing helmets, and we were only measuring *surviving* soldiers, helmets appeared to increase the number of head injuries, rather than decrease their severity. First, IQ tests dont do a great job of measuring autistic people. Yes, the biggest gains from any given exercise are to performing that specific exercise, but gaining strength that way still allows you to do other mostly unrelated motions that use the same muscle group that you couldnt have done without those exercises. This confuses me a little. (Although, arent gene-behavior connections in general pretty suspect, as per your previous post?) That would give me more than enough money to give the middle finger to all the ignorant normies in our politically correct society, with plenty left over to hire some bodyguards and build mechanical defense systems to insulate me from any of the outraged pearl-clutching idiots who decided to use physical violence against me when their threat of social sanctioning wasnt enough. Other times, the conversations would seem weird as hell in most placesdiscussions of physics or evolution or game theory or genetics or whatever, with a high background level of assumed knowledge. Take these away and you arrive at something that seems like an effortless confidence and freedom. And since mental traits like intelligence, social aptitude, and self-control are the ones most likely to be selected for in society, it makes sense that our imbalances would primarily be mental. You dont need to be an absolute dictator or god-king to be able to ignore social norms all you need is lots of money. (2) Genes associated with autism arent being selected for As for my own personal experience, Ive found that people with high conceptual intelligence (as opposed to mathematical intelligence) tend to be more charismatic. I dont know why, but my prior is that the mothers age matters more. From a certain perspective, it merges with normal. Hes amazing! I cant tell if this is evidence against Crespi or whether since all intellectual abilities are correlated this is just the shadow of their high perceptual intelligence, and if we directly looked at perceptual-to-verbal ratio we would see it was lower than expected. Im not a great student of philosophy, but I dont think most modern philosophers look at the writings of Plato or Descartes or Kant or Hume and think they were intellectual lightweights. I would file this under partly true. (1) Genes associated with autism arent associated with IQ This model predicts something I believe is true many low functioning autistic people have real talents lurking in there, it is just really hard for them or others to access those talents because of all the broken stuff. Gender dysphoria. Additionally, look at the lives of geniuses throughout American history. If females have a higher average baseline social competence, it would stand to reason that even the impaired girls would remain above the diagnosis threshold in greater numbers. Some might get lucky and be able to manage the negatives from such unusual prior models away by the effects of other quirks, say having abstract thoughts feel more natural through some particular tweaks making the net their active inference casts wider with higher error tolerance or by lowering the interconnectivity between different oversensitive mental modules that they dont interfere with one another as much or whatnot then you get high-functioning autistic individuals, maybe Newtons one cliched example of that sort of configuration. (That said, it becomes an incredibly strong correlation if youre taking mentally disabled people into account, as people with IQs below 70 tend to have extremely poor social skills.). But if you pile on enough of the genes that increase IQ by increasing your head circumference, you will get a kid with such a huge head that his neck wont support it and his heart and lungs cant keep his giant brain in oxygenated blood, and hell die as a baby. They also have higher rates of having children with multiple partners. But as mentioned before, autistic people themselves on average have lower intelligence. We have another child who shows no autistic traits. Maybe specific areas for different such quirks of processing have some optimal Goldilocks zones for their values, which if all fit might give you some sort of the upper bounds of human intelligence-maybe there are multiple such optimal/viable configurations, however hitting all the targets simultaneously must be relatively rare, and some of the targets might be smallish, others might be essentially fixed without some de novo mutation for likely good evolutionary reasons. But her personal life is a mess. control children (though see the discussion here) for some debate over how seriously to take this; I am less sure this is accurate than most of the other statistics mentioned here. EDIT: Ive certainly known highly intelligent people who did not seem to be crazy or disfunctional in any obvious way. 9 hours ago View Detailed Check-in. Overall scores could continue to rise due to the Flynn effect even as intelligence is being selected against on a genetic level, which is what the evidence is suggesting. Its not like theyll answer anybody. My problem with this kind of model is that some people are geniuses but dont have autism. IQb medium genetic load : high intelligence, autistic highly functional autist or autistic tendencies, strongly tenchnically inclined Now that Aspergers syndrome has been removed from the DSM, in favour of something understood by lay people as autism, Ive become autistic, along with a fair number of other geeks, nerds, etc. It is often said that male IQ has the same mean as female IQ but greater variance, so you find more men in both tails of the IQ distribution. When she was three, she had symptoms of autism. And also reproducing younger (banking frozen eggs and/or sperm early for the IVF). We dont have an understanding of how autism exists in the general populace so our data is skewed towards the worst because of where that data comes from. This is a common situation, but not with many genes of small effect. I think top 1% is too low a bar for incredibly. I dont think there was much correlation at all with years of formal education, and the paths their lives and careers took are almost unimaginable now. For each parameters, there are many alleles in different locations that can bump the parameters a certain directionmake the babys head[1] a little bigger, for example. Polimanti and Gelemter (2017) find that autism risk genes arent just sticking around. For example, they are not extremely aggressive, but tend to be gentle individuals. Drink your Brawndo! Has anyone here actually met a highly intelligent person who is genuinely normal? Could there be some sort of input(s)/connection(s) in early development which is responsible for the development or unfolding of intelligence like that? This would be consistent with the idea that more aggressive screening (which is likely to be most aggressive at schools full of white kids because those schools have better resources for such things on average) would cause this effect size to shrink considerably if not vanish. Non-verbal people requiring institutionalization? Kylounet is drinking a CAMBIER Double Galaxy by Brasserie Cambier at Terroir Alternatif. It's kind of sick. Why conflate diagnosed with autism with has autism? Even when you get it high enough, to the point of being too much of a good thing, if its a rock show some people are still going to want it higher. threshold and massive achievement, massive achievement should have exploded in recent decades. Id cheerfully get in bed with the military-industrial complex -in fact, Id probably be rock-hard the whole time. Today, he weighs about 195. This correlation may not be very high though, because genes often code for a lot of different things at the same time so the mental illness may affect a different hyperparameter than the one that makes the parents smart. Anecdote is not data, which overwhelmingly show a negative correlation between IQ and fertility. I was under the impression, that IQ was culturally biased, as DNA Markers would be. I would say that 80% of them carry a fair amount of weirdness with them, which shows in speech impediments, idiosyncratic/shitty clothing styles and obsessions with bizarre topics. There is no reason to think that e.g. Kindof like we could genetically engineer all people to be tetrachromats. It is very, very smart, but nobody dares reproduce naturally anymore, not because the equipment doesnt work, but because genetic engineering means everyone pushed every single one of these levers to the setting marked beyond this point, there be dragons, and at least half their kids would die or come out completely non-functional if they tried it.
Hendersonville Mobile Village,
Which Of The Following Is A Rite Of Intensification?,
Articles S
