One hundred years ago, on April 6, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson went to the Capitol to secure support to commit the United States to what became known as World War I. Anyone who visits Washington, D.C. today and tours the historical sites will see a memorial to “The World War,” the expectation being that what we now know as WWI was it. Over 35 million people—soldiers and civilians—lost their lives during this four years of carnage.
That’s roughly 24,000 people a day, or about 17 people every minute. Part of the reason for the carnage was that the new technology designed for killing far outpaced the outdated tactics of conventional warfare. The introduction of chemical weapons, not to mention the superior technology of bombs and bullets, made for death and destruction like never before.
A Scott Berg’s biography of Woodrow Wilson titled Wilson is a thorough, well-researched, and exhaustive introduction to this period of American—and world—history. Berg chronicle’s Wilson’s life from the time when he, as a young boy, along with the rest of Augusta, Georgia, witnessed with shame as Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederate States, was being marched through the streets of the city while being surrounded by federal guards, to Wilson’s signing the Treaty of Versailles in France on June 28, 1919.
He fairly represents the political debate that surrounded America’s coming to terms with the fact that it was now on the verge of being a world leader rather than an isolationist country, and the maturation of Wilson’s own thinking from a leader whose second term election slogan was “I kept you out of the War” to being the first President to lead the United States into a World War. Berg brings to life such towering figures as Teddy Roosevelt, former President and perpetual Wilson critique, and John Cabot Lodge, Wilson’s other nemesis; the senior senator from Massachusetts and leader in the effort to block the President from signing the Treaty of Versailles—the treaty where he, Wilson, was the primary author.
There is no question that Wilson was a brilliant man. He came from a family of Presbyterian ministers who served in both the United States, and in Scotland. But rather than pursue the ministry, Wilson first studied the law, and eventually settled on earning a Ph.D. in a new academic field called political science.
After achieving his degree from Princeton University, he went on to teach at several small colleges, working his way back to Princeton where he was easily the most popular member of the faculty. Wilson became President of Princeton in which capacity he served for over a decade, and then became Governor of New Jersey, a post he held for under two years before he was elected President of the United States.
Like many presidents before and after him, Wilson ran on a domestic policy agenda but ended up spending the majority of his time on international affairs. He created an income tax to pay for the War, was President when Prohibition began, and oversaw the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution which secured the right for women to vote.
He was the most powerful man in the world for about six years of his presidency but then, after suffering a debilitating stroke and a humiliating defeat, he spent the last year-and-a-half of his presidency in relative isolation. The Senate’s failure to ratify the Treaty and join the League of Nations, ultimately, killed him. Wilson died at the age 67—less than three years after leaving office.
So why is this book about Woodrow Wilson important?
Candidly, prior to reading Berg’s biography, I knew very little about either Woodrow Wilson or this period of American history. A friend of mine gave me a copy of the book and, after a start and stop or two, I couldn’t put it down.
In retrospect, I was captured by many of the parallels between that time in American history one-hundred years ago—and today. Debates between nationalism and broader world engagement, existential concerns about other cultures (xenophobia), technology replacing the jobs of factory workers, the economy, and the relationship between the “free market” and “government controls” were all as real then as they are now.
Though not a direct parallel, there are parts of history that are repeating itself, and from which we can learn.
Wilson can best be described as a complex leader. He was as humble as he was arrogant; as privileged as he was tempered by having spent much time in “sorrow’s kitchen.” He was the last President to write his own speeches, and he gave many of them, most of them as brilliant as they were eloquent, without the aid of amplification or mass distribution.
Had the radio existed, Wilson, rather than Roosevelt, would have introduced the “Fireside Chat.” He could often be cruel and condescending. He was incapable of letting go of a grudge and, after his stroke, he became more paranoid and petty. The Presidency made him—and the Presidency broke him. End of story.
Nevertheless, today’s leaders can learn a lot by reading this biography of Woodrow Wilson. It will take an investment of time and intellectual curiosity, as most constructive endeavors usually do. By the conclusion, I suspect that you’ll come away, as I did, having witnessed a paradox in leadership; a person who was as visionary as he was naïve; a well-intended prophet of his time, before his time, who, on balance, was more often right than he was wrong.
Through him, you’ll experience the maturation of our nation from adolescence to adulthood, and all of the challenges and opportunities that come with it.
Some well-known quotations attributed to Woodrow Wilson:
[bctt tweet=”“I not only use all the brains that I have, but all of the brains that I can borrow.” – Woodrow Wilson” via=”no”]
[bctt tweet=”“If you want to make enemies, try to change something.” – Woodrow Wilson” via=”no”]
I agree; history is repeating itself, but in a vastly different world. Wilson is indeed a paradox in thought and action. I would also suggest checking out a periodical, The Wilson Quarterly, as it is at once, intellectually challenging and far ranging in its topics covered.
Besides being called, “The World War,” we should also recall other contemporary names for WWI were, “The Great War” and “The War To End All Wars.” There certainly is nothing “great” about war and it sure did not end war, but neither did the invention of the crossbow, despite predictions at that time.
Parallels of isolationism and ethnocentric, xenophobia aside, Wilson was a Progressive (Southern Democrat) that won the presidential election by a sizable electoral and popular vote because the Republican split created a three-way race, e.g. the Bull Moose Party. That was something I was hoping for in 2016, as I could not bring myself to vote “for the lesser of two evils.”
Besides the concept of the League of Nations failure, emerging into the United Nations, we should not forget another Wilson quote in his request to Congress for a declaration of war, “The world must be made safe for democracy.” This lasting legacy continues to make America act as “policeman of the world” to our peril and continual drain of blood and money into cultures that have no historical framework or values and mores to plug-into democratic governance or capitalism.
On the other-hand, because the world has become smaller and financially interconnected, I do not know how the United States can just ignore the atrocities governments/groups carryout and starvation/natural catastrophes that occur and not do anything. Then again, I will never forget the blind eye America gave to Czechoslovakia in 1968 when the Soviet Union invaded Prague to quash the liberalizing Dubcek government in the face and iron grip of the Cold War USSR and the Warsaw Pact nations. We neither said nor did anything; even after a student, Jan Palach, performed self-immolation in Wenceslas Square as a supreme act of political protest.
Alas, another world change is Politics… in the nuclear age.
William,
Thank you for sharing your insightful thoughts.
I too believe that history continues to repeat itself with no apparent easy way to break the continous cycle. This past summer I started reading The Federalist Papers and found what was creating turmoil in our relatively new country. Many of the points made by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison in these papers to the people of the State of New York at the critical time of ratifying the U.S. Constitution are very much the same today. We can only hope that our leaders of today will apply the values established in 1787 continuously referred to by leaders such as Lincoln, Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and others.
Mark,
Sorry this is so late. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and comments. Yes…history does have a way of repeating itself!
Jeff
Brad,
Sorry this response is so late. I’ve not yet seen the PBS mini-series, but will need to do so. And, yes….the many paradoxes of our own lives and leadership. Enough said.
Thanks!
Jeff
Thanks, Jeffrey. I haven’t read the book, but I watched the PBS mini-series on World War 1 and, in addition to noticing the similarities between the issues of a century ago and today, I, too, was struck by his paradoxes – his strong faith background and high morals, side-by-side with “traditional” views that we would view today as racist, sexist, etc. It may have taken Wilson off of whatever pedestal I might have held him on before, but it also reminded me to consider the paradoxes in my own life and leadership!
If I remember correctly, on his deathbed he finally figured out the horrible mistake he had made by involving us in the Federal Reserve. He said “I have sold my country into slavery.”
It’s kind of overwhelming to think about what the last 100 years has brought–and that the issues that led us to the bloodiest 100 years ever known haven’t disappeared.
Thanks for the important post Jeff.
Thank you, Dr. Bullock. I appreciate your comments as a new student of American History, especially of the Founding Era and World War II. Your thoughts reminded me of a recent discussion I heard about Woodrow Wilson and his 6 volume work on A HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. There is concern that his work, which was used as a textbook in many schools, contributed largely to a skewed narrative on our history of African-Americans in our country. Certainly, there is unmistakable ugliness in our story. There is also tremendous testimony to the champions-of many ethnic communities, and ideals upon which our country was founded and a truth that pulls us forward. Martin Luther King Jr. referred to this during his speech as he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964:
I accept this award today…With an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind..Sooner or later all the people of the world will have to discover a way to live together in peace. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality.
In addition to a decreasing awareness of early American history and the ideals upon which the US was founded, one could argue that there are two competing stories of the African American experience being taught in our schools today. One includes the good, bad, and the ugly, while the other one includes just the bad and the ugly. For example, Ibrahim Kendi’s book, Stamped from the Beginning: the Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America promotes a narrative skewed to the bad and ugly. The work also includes factual inaccuracies, half-truths that hold up the premise. The book has been utilized on our campus. On the other hand, I relish the personal conversations that I had with Lt. Robert Martin of the famed Tuskegee airman. I asked him why he was willing to fight for a country who was treating him so poorly. “Rick,” he said, “We knew what was going on in Europe (referencing the Holocaust) so we knew it could get worse. We believed in what American stood for and we knew things would get better.”
Why would this be important? Think of the impact on young students of color and especially African American youth. What would happen in the hearts of people after hearing both stories? How would the different narratives impact sense of self, their sense of being a valued citizen, their desire to be involved in their community and to engage others different from themselves? Truth includes the good, bad, and ugly. As Martin Luther King, Jr. stated, truth will be a defining element of any success.
History matters. What we teach our students about history is critical. Historian David Barton has identified 6 mal practices witnessed in public education over the past 25 years.
1. Historical Negativism- the steady flow of belittling and demeaning portrayals of Western heroes, beliefs, values, and institutions
2. Historical Relativism – in history, religion, culture and law there are no absolute truths nor transcendent principles; values are determined individually and personal standards trump traditional standards
3. Anti-Nationalism- pulls down what is traditionally honored and undermines patriotism, or the love of one’s country
4. Modernism or Presentism- examines historical events and persons as if they occurred and lived today rather than in the past
5. Minimalism or Reductionism -unreasonable insistence on oversimplification-on reducing everything to single causes and linear effects
6. Rigid Secularism – presents an inaccurate and distorted view of religious influences in American history
It’s intriguing to consider how this phenomena is manifesting itself in our society and college students today. I would appreciate any opportunity to engage this topic further.