alaska supreme court oral argument

Anthony V. Bennett v. Eugenia Bennett :: 2019 :: Alaska Supreme Court Contact us. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. each argument week, the Court also makes the audio of the weeks arguments available. 0000001852 00000 n But lawmakers also imposed a deadline for former employees who cashed out their retirement contributions when they left. Furthermore, the superior court is only required to consider the cost of sale of awarded property in a property division when the sale is certain and the direct result of the property division.14 Here the court acknowledged that Burns-Marshall could decide whether to sell or keep the properties, even though it recognized that Burns-Marshall would likely have to sell or liquidate some assets to make the equalization payment. (1) Designation of Parts of Record to be Transcribed. The chief justice, Peter Maassen began his term in February 2023, succeeding Justice Daniel Winfree. 40 Years in Corrections: Are We Going Forward or Backward? THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA MARK N. WAYSON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM E. STEVENSON, Appellee. ) FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Supreme Court Calendar (October Term 2022) (PDF) - (Current Term) (Amended Dec. 12, 2022) Supreme Court Calendar . The Superior Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion By Failing To Address The Costs And Risks Of Sale Of The Property. Alaska R. App. and 0000009687 00000 n : S-18170: LANCE PRUITT v. For the 1:30pm criminal matters Monday through Thursday and 10:00am on Fridays: CINA/DL Parties: contact the Nome Court at (907) 443-5216 for call-in information. 0000005682 00000 n Current MO&Js are also available on the Alaska Court System website. The five supreme court justices, by majority vote, select one of their members to be the chief justice. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. The practice of law is always geared in one way or another toward making arguments 197 0 obj <>stream S-18314 ) ) ) Superior Court No. Tab/Window, - Opens in New Conference line (toll free): 1-888-788-0099 The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important. In Anchorage, arguments are held in the fifth floor courtroom of the Boney Courthouse at 303 K Street. J?* h 9$XDvf`5@HE=K[4# . The ACLU's brief to the Alaska Supreme Court asking that the Court affirm a state Superior Court ruling and dismiss the government's appeal. Burns-Marshall testified that he had never sexually assaulted Krogman or been physically violent against her. After Alaska became a state in 1959, the Alaska Constitution created the Alaska Supreme Court. If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 772-3824 and hit 0 or send an email to 1PEmailbox@akcourts.gov, If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to 1SImailbox@akcourts.gov. Alaska Natives into Nursing (RRANN), Recruitment The three-minute line is temporarily SCOTUS ruling on abortion pill isn't a victory, WA advocates say 0000005078 00000 n To participate by phone, you need to (1) call the conference line, and then (2) dial the specific Meeting ID associated with the courtroom or judge. Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall had waived any right to reopen discovery and that he had actual and constructive notice of the allegations of substance abuse and domestic violence. Customers should call 874-2311 or email 1WRmailbox@akcourts.gov to schedule a time to meet with the Clerk. But he could have avoided such a surprise: he could have conducted discovery before trial. On the Friday of hb``` cb%L Learn more about our Accessibility policy and how to provide feedback. I was very pleased to learn that on Friday, the [Alaska] Supreme Court reaffirmed the Constitution, that its not constitutional for the legislature to try just, by legislation, overcome a promise in the Constitution, said Peter Metcalfe of Juneau, who brought the suit. And the legislature chose to do it anyway because they thought it would save them a lot of money. PDF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TECK AMERICAN INCORPORATED and 5. Garden Talk. Supreme Court cases on affirmative action threaten diversity in medicine Explore the wide variety of services and resources available at UAA to help promote your The court observed that Krogman would no longer have health insurance and that the disparity in the parties income required it to deviate from a 50/50 split. 1916 - August 31, 2022 Appeal from the . The days on which arguments are held are identified on the On days when the Court is not in session, the building will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., excluding weekends and federal holidays. The court divided the property 60/40 in Krogman's favor because of the disparity in the parties earning capacity and because she would no longer have health insurance through Burns-Marshall's job. (3) Preparation Not at Public Expense. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. The eight-year-old class action lawsuit was previously considered by thelower courts twice alreadyandtwice appealedto the Alaska Supreme Court. PDF In the Superior Court for The State of Alaska Alaska's supreme court was founded along with the rest of Alaska's court system, about six months after statehood. Studies - Kodiak, Alaska Native Business Management Even if he had not done so, he could have asked for a continuance of the trial to conduct discovery when Krogman raised the issue, or he could have filed a timely motion to reopen the evidence following the court's application of the presumption against him. (this link has information about court calendars for different locations around the state). Burns-Marshall appeals the superior court's denial of the motion to reopen and its property division. and other impacts were raised during oral argument. It was a defined benefit retirement plan which included guaranteed income for life for a retired employee. Tiffany A. Semenza v. Jeffrey Rady (Unpublished), AVCG, LLC v. Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Jack W. Fredrickson v. Allison O. Hackett (Unpublished), Terry M. Parsons v. Craig City School District and Alaska Municipal League Joint Insurance Association (Unpublished), Michael Mann Jr. v. Hannah Maus (Unpublished), M.T. Wrangell customer service is modified to be appointment only. Meet the Lawyer in Charge of Saving Roe v. Wade | Time The court meets after oral argument and on a bi-weekly basis to confer on cases argued orally and on cases submitted on the briefs. A justice can be removed by being impeached by two-thirds of the Alaska Senate and convicted by two-thirds of the Alaska House of Representatives. Because we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Burns-Marshall's motion to present additional evidence we do not reach his due process argument. trailer languages, cultures, history, politics, art, governments and corporations. CINA/DL Parties: contact the Utqiagvik Court at (907) 852-4800 for call-in information. The Court of Appeals Oral Arguments are streamed live and are not archived for viewing later. The superior court ruled against the legislators, concluding the legislatures actual use of the income remained subject to normal appropriation and veto budgetary processes. Tollefsen, 981 P.2d at 572; cf. the day call for each argument session. Mariah B. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS :: 2022 :: Alaska Supreme Court All rights reserved. in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer All hearings continue to be telephonic only. They also can be removed, suspended, or censured at the discretion of the Supreme Court, based on a recommendation by the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct. : S-18082 S-18101: IN RE: THE 2021 REDISTRICTING CASES (Matanuska-Susitna Borough: April 21, 2023: Supreme Court Nos. Because the husband waived any argument that he should be allowed to present additional evidence and the court did not abuse its discretion in its property division, we affirm. Represent Yourself Students can take advantage of cheering for SeawolfNation with free Also see FAQs on how to participate in a Zoom Hearing/Meeting. Under the Alaska Constitution, the supreme court establishes rules for the administration of all courts in the state and for practice and procedure in civil and criminal cases. Like all Alaska state court judges, Alaska Supreme Court justices are appointed under a Missouri Plan system. Burns-Marshall worked seasonally as a pipe layer and found other temporary employment or collected unemployment compensation during the winter. Alaska Supreme Court Oral Arguments - KTOO When the legislature did this in 2005, there was a lot of pushback, I think, within the legal community, people giving advice, saying This is not right. One current and two former legislators later sued to effectively set aside the governors veto. The court divided the marital property 60/40 in favor of the wife, awarded all of the real property to the husband, and ordered him to make an equalization payment. We've adopted a different strategy in this case from, say, Lieu v. FEC: Our aim is to argue to the originalists on the United States Supreme . The court consists of five justices, one of whom is internally chosen to serve as chief justice for a three-year term. To be eligible for nomination, a candidate must be a U.S. citizen, a resident of Alaska for the last five years, licensed to practice in Alaska, and an actively practicing attorney for the last eight years. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 17 in the Texas case, but it is expected to make it to the Supreme Court eventually, along with a case from Washington seeking instead to broaden access to . After the second company abandoned the claims, the first company, Justia Opinion Summary: Alaska Venture Capital Group, LLC (AVCG) owned interests in oil and gas leases on state lands. Krogman testified that there had been incidents of domestic violence both before and during their marriage. Supreme Court oral arguments are taking forever. The justices - CNN The Alaska Supreme Court hears appeals from lower state courts and also administers the state's judicial system. Get free summaries of new Alaska Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! In a November motion she referred to Burns-Marshall's harsh and controlling behavior throughout the marriage, and alleged that Burns-Marshall had previously been convicted of minor consuming alcohol and that he still drinks to excess. But in January 2017 Krogman opposed Burns-Marshall's motion for the appointment of a child custody investigator because their child was too young for an interview to be helpful and because there were no bad facts or anything so unusual or troubling about this case that would require a child custody investigation. Alaska Supreme Court Oral Arguments Media Player Error Oral Arguments: Allen v. Phillips Petroleum, S-8690 Allen appeals a denial for compulsory unitization of two oil and gas leases. Arguments are generally The court also found in the alternative that it would have awarded Krogman sole legal and primary physical custody based upon its consideration of the child's best interests. 0000000016 00000 n 0000008355 00000 n In her pleadings and motions Krogman made seemingly inconsistent statements about the trial and her marriage with Burns-Marshall. Although the MO&Js and most orders are not published, the MO&Js are available for public inspection at the Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau offices of the clerk of the appellate courts, and the orders are filed in the clerk's Anchorage office. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. See what's %PDF-1.6 % (1) If either party desires oral argument on the motion, that party shall request a hearing within five days after service of a responsive pleading or the time limit for filing such a responsive pleading, whichever is earlier. 3AN-17-05729 CI ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND JUDGMENT* The Supreme Court's oral argument calendar is viewable at http://courts.alaska.gov/appcts.htm. Its decisions are binding on all other Alaska state courts, and the only court its decisions may be appealed to is the Supreme Court of the United States. Original story Oral argument will be held on Monday, October 12, 2020 at 1:30 PM in the State of Alaska v. Arctic Village. Appellee. ) The Court began audio recording oral arguments in 1955. Dundas, 362 P.3d at 478-80 (finding that tax consequences had to be considered for equipment sold before property division, property already in process of being sold at time of trial, and property that court approved sale of before trial). The supreme court has final state appellate jurisdiction in both civil and criminal law matters. To participate by phone, you need to (1) call the conference line, and then (2) dial the specific Meeting ID associated with the courtroom or judge. Rikelman speaks to abortion rights supporters after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 4, 2020 Alyssa SchukarCenter for Reproductive Rights/AP 'Concerning for the rule of law' recreation and more, facilitating once-in-a-lifetime experiences, groundbreaking education and the instructor in Trial and Advanced Litigation Processes. 0000001068 00000 n It found Krogman more credible than Burns-Marshall and found by a preponderance of the evidence that multiple acts of domestic violence, including several incidents of sexual assault, had occurred. Contact your local cable provider for channel information. for available lectures. Supreme Court Rules to Protect Access to the Abortion Pill For Now The court ordered that Burns-Marshall would be allowed to have unsupervised visits over Thanksgiving, Christmas, and spring vacation after he completed any recommended treatment. Parents/Guardians, Alaska the local legal community, and within UAA, the hope is that the presence of a simulated Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. PDF Alaska Rules of Court If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to 1SImailbox@akcourts.gov. ORAL ARGUMENT OF MATTHEW GUARNIERI ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER IN CASE NO. 7. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images. hbbd``b`AD6`y$$A - F!+hO0012YT"3|0 w( A divorcing couple disputed custody of their child and division of their marital property. such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). It included inflation and cost-of-living adjustments, and medical coverage for a public employee or teacher and their dependents when they retired as soon as age 50. MARIAH B., Supreme Court No. 9. When a position needs to be filled, the Alaska Judicial Council will compile a list of nominees, from which the Governor of Alaska must choose the new justice within 45 days. While the court's property division made it likely that Burns-Marshall would have to sell or liquidate some property to make the equalization payment to Krogman, the sale of the real property was not so certain as to require the court to consider the consequences of its sale.15 Under these circumstances, it was not an abuse of discretion to award Burns-Marshall the property without considering the costs of sale.16. excel in athletics at every level. %PDF-1.7 % The legislators argued that the longstanding dividend program was a law exempt from the anti-dedication clause. Argument Transcripts; Argument Audio; Calendars and Lists; Courtroom Seating; CASE DOCUMENTS. Students are required to The court ordered that Burns-Marshall have contact with the child by Skype or Facetime twice a week. The Alaska Supreme Court is the state supreme court for the U.S. state of Alaska. (e)Oral Argument. 3AN-14-10875 CI MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT* No. the Court holds two arguments each day beginning at 10:00 a.m., each lasting one hour. (5) Filing and Distribution. Sitka. Cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text. The Supreme Court Oral Arguments are broadcast for viewing on the Gavel Alaska website .

Karnataka International Volleyball Players List, Articles A